Hindenburg Research has strongly refuted allegations made by India’s securities regulator, the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi), accusing the US-based short-seller of colluding with a US asset manager to use non-public information for its short bet against Adani Group. The allegations come in a 46-page show cause notice from Sebi, which claims that Hindenburg, along with Kingdon Capital Management and a Mauritian trading fund set up by Kotak Mahindra Bank, violated rules under the Prevention of Fraud and Unfair Trade Practices regulation.
Here is an FAQs on Hindenburg-Sebi issue:
What are the allegations against Hindenburg Research?
Sebi alleges that Hindenburg colluded with Kingdon Capital Management by providing a draft of its report on Adani Group before it was publicly released. This allegedly enabled Kingdon Capital to set up a fund, K Indian Opportunities Fund, to create short positions in Adani stocks ahead of the Hindenburg report. Sebi’s notice claims that these positions were squared off in February, leading to gains of $22.25 million.
How did Hindenburg respond to these allegations?
Hindenburg dismissed the allegations as “nonsense” and a tactic to silence and intimidate them. They accused Sebi of neglecting its responsibility to protect investors and instead protecting those committing fraud. Hindenburg stated, “In our view, Sebi has neglected its responsibility, seemingly doing more to protect those perpetrating fraud than to protect the investors being victimized by it.”
What role did Kotak Mahindra Bank allegedly play in this situation?
Hindenburg’s statement claims that a Mauritius-registered unit of Kotak Mahindra Bank created and oversaw an offshore fund structure used by an unnamed investor to profit from Adani’s share plunge following the Hindenburg report. They criticized Sebi for not naming Kotak in the notice, suggesting that Sebi’s omission might be an attempt to shield another powerful Indian businessman from scrutiny.
What financial gains did Hindenburg report from its Adani short positions?
Hindenburg disclosed that it made $4.1 million in gross revenue through “gains related to Adani shorts from that investor relationship” and just $31,000 from its short position on Adani’s US bonds. They emphasized that this was a relatively small position and reiterated that their work on Adani is the work they are most proud of.
What was Sebi’s response to Hindenburg’s claims?
Sebi has not publicly commented on Hindenburg’s statement or confirmed the authenticity of the show cause order. Representatives for Kotak Mahindra Bank also did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
What was the impact of Hindenburg’s report on Adani Group?
Hindenburg’s January 2023 report alleged stock manipulation and accounting fraud at the Adani group, which led to a dramatic loss of as much as $150 billion in combined market value for Adani’s companies. Although Adani has recovered much of the stock losses since then, the group has continued to deny the allegations, calling them malicious and baseless.
What are Hindenburg’s views on Sebi’s investigation and actions?
Hindenburg has criticized Sebi’s investigation, saying, “After 1.5 years of investigation, Sebi identified zero factual inaccuracies with our Adani research.” They accused Sebi of making baseless legal arguments and advancing claims to undermine Hindenburg’s legally disclosed investment stance. Hindenburg emphasized that their report had fully disclosed their short position on Adani and highlighted what they described as systemic issues within Sebi and its protection of powerful individuals in India.
(With inputs from agencies)
Here is an FAQs on Hindenburg-Sebi issue:
What are the allegations against Hindenburg Research?
Sebi alleges that Hindenburg colluded with Kingdon Capital Management by providing a draft of its report on Adani Group before it was publicly released. This allegedly enabled Kingdon Capital to set up a fund, K Indian Opportunities Fund, to create short positions in Adani stocks ahead of the Hindenburg report. Sebi’s notice claims that these positions were squared off in February, leading to gains of $22.25 million.
How did Hindenburg respond to these allegations?
Hindenburg dismissed the allegations as “nonsense” and a tactic to silence and intimidate them. They accused Sebi of neglecting its responsibility to protect investors and instead protecting those committing fraud. Hindenburg stated, “In our view, Sebi has neglected its responsibility, seemingly doing more to protect those perpetrating fraud than to protect the investors being victimized by it.”
What role did Kotak Mahindra Bank allegedly play in this situation?
Hindenburg’s statement claims that a Mauritius-registered unit of Kotak Mahindra Bank created and oversaw an offshore fund structure used by an unnamed investor to profit from Adani’s share plunge following the Hindenburg report. They criticized Sebi for not naming Kotak in the notice, suggesting that Sebi’s omission might be an attempt to shield another powerful Indian businessman from scrutiny.
What financial gains did Hindenburg report from its Adani short positions?
Hindenburg disclosed that it made $4.1 million in gross revenue through “gains related to Adani shorts from that investor relationship” and just $31,000 from its short position on Adani’s US bonds. They emphasized that this was a relatively small position and reiterated that their work on Adani is the work they are most proud of.
What was Sebi’s response to Hindenburg’s claims?
Sebi has not publicly commented on Hindenburg’s statement or confirmed the authenticity of the show cause order. Representatives for Kotak Mahindra Bank also did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
What was the impact of Hindenburg’s report on Adani Group?
Hindenburg’s January 2023 report alleged stock manipulation and accounting fraud at the Adani group, which led to a dramatic loss of as much as $150 billion in combined market value for Adani’s companies. Although Adani has recovered much of the stock losses since then, the group has continued to deny the allegations, calling them malicious and baseless.
What are Hindenburg’s views on Sebi’s investigation and actions?
Hindenburg has criticized Sebi’s investigation, saying, “After 1.5 years of investigation, Sebi identified zero factual inaccuracies with our Adani research.” They accused Sebi of making baseless legal arguments and advancing claims to undermine Hindenburg’s legally disclosed investment stance. Hindenburg emphasized that their report had fully disclosed their short position on Adani and highlighted what they described as systemic issues within Sebi and its protection of powerful individuals in India.
(With inputs from agencies)