The war of words between Munawar Faruqui and Elvish Yadav shows no signs of ending anytime soon. The stand-up comedian recently took another jab at Elvish Yadav and his close friend Lovekesh Kataria, who is currently on Bigg Boss OTT season 3. Munawar Faruqui, the winner of Bigg Boss 17, has been closely following the reality show and recently shared his thoughts on the current season.He humorously critiqued Lovekesh Kataria‘s participation and commented on Elvish Yadav’s controversial personal life.
Additionally, the stand-up comedian remarked on Vishal Pandey’s controversial comment aimed at Armaan Malik’s second wife, Kritika Malik. Munawar Faruqui first mocked Vishal Pandey’s controversial statement, suggesting, “Vishal’s team should post a one-second reel, I might also get hits…” Then, referring to Elvish Yadav being summoned by the ED in the Snake Venom case, Munawar commented, “Kataria ke doston ke naseeb mai chakki peesna hi likha he kya? (Are grinding mills written in the fate of Kataria’s friends?)”

Once again, Munawar took a subtle jab at Vishal, remarking, “I just hope Bigg Boss doesn’t play the song ‘bhabhi tum khushiyon ka khazana’ as the morning alarm just to mess around.” Lastly, poking fun at Lovekesh Kataria, Munawar quipped, “Place your bets, Kataria will win this season for sure. The only thing is, I don’t know which app to place the bet on…”
For those unaware, Munawar Faruqui and Elvish Yadav have been engaged in a longstanding feud. Regarding Munawar’s remarks about Elvish, the latter has been summoned by the Lucknow unit of the Enforcement Directorate (ED) in relation to a money laundering case linked to the snake venom incident.
The winner of Bigg Boss OTT 2 has been summoned by the ED for questioning on July 23, following his earlier inability to appear on July 8 due to a foreign tour. Lovekesh Kataria, currently a contestant on Bigg Boss OTT 3, is a close friend of Elvish Yadav.

Elvish Yadav Summoned by ED in Snake Venom-Rave Party Case: All You Want To Know About The Money Laundering Case





Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *